<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MedBlogs Grand Rounds 3:16</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Emergency Physician in Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GruntDoc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5123</link>
		<dc:creator>GruntDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5123</guid>
		<description>Themes are very empowering to the host: their number of submitted posts is a fraction of a non-themed GRounds, and therefore makes the job easier.

My problem with themed rounds is that a) it excludes a LOT of excellent writing on blogs that, for whatever reason didn&#039;t write about that weeks&#039; theme, depriving them of links, traffic and comments, and b) if the theme chosen isn&#039;t interesting to some readers they aren&#039;t going to read any of it.  Frankly, none of the themed rounds have been remarkable to me, except for their brevity.

So, I&#039;m still against them, and will participate only if they fit what I was already blogging.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Themes are very empowering to the host: their number of submitted posts is a fraction of a non-themed GRounds, and therefore makes the job easier.</p>
<p>My problem with themed rounds is that a) it excludes a LOT of excellent writing on blogs that, for whatever reason didn&#8217;t write about that weeks&#8217; theme, depriving them of links, traffic and comments, and b) if the theme chosen isn&#8217;t interesting to some readers they aren&#8217;t going to read any of it.  Frankly, none of the themed rounds have been remarkable to me, except for their brevity.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m still against them, and will participate only if they fit what I was already blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signout</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5122</link>
		<dc:creator>Signout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5122</guid>
		<description>Wow! I didn&#039;t realize there was so much disgruntlement (heh) over having themed Grand Rounds. A theme seemed like a good way to collect a bunch of talented writers in blogging about something that all of them can easily write or have already likely written about. It also seemed that, to the reader, a themed collection can make a stronger point as a whole than a non-themed collection.

I know I can&#039;t please everyone, and I&#039;m not going to try to. However, I do urge you to consider the advantages of a themed GR--and considering how incredibly likely it is that your work could fit into it--before writing it off wholesale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I didn&#8217;t realize there was so much disgruntlement (heh) over having themed Grand Rounds. A theme seemed like a good way to collect a bunch of talented writers in blogging about something that all of them can easily write or have already likely written about. It also seemed that, to the reader, a themed collection can make a stronger point as a whole than a non-themed collection.</p>
<p>I know I can&#8217;t please everyone, and I&#8217;m not going to try to. However, I do urge you to consider the advantages of a themed GR&#8211;and considering how incredibly likely it is that your work could fit into it&#8211;before writing it off wholesale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dribear</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5121</link>
		<dc:creator>dribear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5121</guid>
		<description>Not a fan of themes either, and hence why I didn&#039;t submit this week.  When I read the amount of time some bloggers spent on grand rounds it made me feel inadequate.  sheesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a fan of themes either, and hence why I didn&#8217;t submit this week.  When I read the amount of time some bloggers spent on grand rounds it made me feel inadequate.  sheesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GruntDoc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5120</link>
		<dc:creator>GruntDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5120</guid>
		<description>Geez, I didn&#039;t realize next week&#039;s is also a &#039;theme&#039;.  I swear some of these hosts think we&#039;re part of a writing school.

OTOH, it&#039;s a clever way to keep the number of posts down, making their job of hosting a lot easier.  Which begs the question why many hosts need 36 hours to prepare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, I didn&#8217;t realize next week&#8217;s is also a &#8216;theme&#8217;.  I swear some of these hosts think we&#8217;re part of a writing school.</p>
<p>OTOH, it&#8217;s a clever way to keep the number of posts down, making their job of hosting a lot easier.  Which begs the question why many hosts need 36 hours to prepare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMTtoDoc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5119</link>
		<dc:creator>EMTtoDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5119</guid>
		<description>Not that I&#039;m some huge blogging powerhouse or anything, but I considered submitting this week.  
&quot;Emotions in Healthcare&quot; theme?  

I feel like I&#039;m writing a paper for school.  Unless I can submit an old post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;m some huge blogging powerhouse or anything, but I considered submitting this week.<br />
&#8220;Emotions in Healthcare&#8221; theme?  </p>
<p>I feel like I&#8217;m writing a paper for school.  Unless I can submit an old post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Nic</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html/comment-page-1#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/01/medblogs-grand-rounds-316.html#comment-5118</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you and Bard-Parker on the theme idea.  I had a great post to submit to grand rounds, but I wasn&#039;t about to re-write it to fit a  food theme.  I find the theme constraining rather than inspiring.  I think it limits quality posts.

dr. nic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you and Bard-Parker on the theme idea.  I had a great post to submit to grand rounds, but I wasn&#8217;t about to re-write it to fit a  food theme.  I find the theme constraining rather than inspiring.  I think it limits quality posts.</p>
<p>dr. nic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

