<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JCAHO Regains it Senses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Emergency Physician in Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N=1</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html/comment-page-1#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>N=1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html#comment-6154</guid>
		<description>OK - I must be missing something here - what about critical access hospitals without an ED attending on site?  Or where the ED doc is on call?

And how does that standard impact pre-hospital care by medics working from algorithms?  Are they mandating changes in how ED docs interface with field medics around medication administration?

This seems to be such a pot-holed road to go down.... I wonder if the JCAHO folks would just hold off and instead let the IHI take the initiative to develop standards around ED safe medication administration - that would much more pragmatic and palatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; I must be missing something here &#8211; what about critical access hospitals without an ED attending on site?  Or where the ED doc is on call?</p>
<p>And how does that standard impact pre-hospital care by medics working from algorithms?  Are they mandating changes in how ED docs interface with field medics around medication administration?</p>
<p>This seems to be such a pot-holed road to go down&#8230;. I wonder if the JCAHO folks would just hold off and instead let the IHI take the initiative to develop standards around ED safe medication administration &#8211; that would much more pragmatic and palatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html/comment-page-1#comment-6152</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/2007/06/jcaho-regains-it-senses.html#comment-6152</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me. All the red tape worries me more and more. Let doctors and nurses do what they do best: care for the patient in an efficient and rapid fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me. All the red tape worries me more and more. Let doctors and nurses do what they do best: care for the patient in an efficient and rapid fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

