<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transfers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Emergency Physician in Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12464</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12464</guid>
		<description>Having managed a hospital transfer center accepting nearly 3000 patients a year and working in a &quot;model&quot;, yet dysfunctional, trauma system I agree with the originating author.  Hospitals have a responsibility to determine the average needs of the community they serve and then to make a good faith effort to meet those needs.  Have 2 orthopedic surgeons on staff scoping knees and performing other profitable procedures Monday through Friday?  Then make a plan to provide coverage for the colles&#039; fracture that walks into your ER at least 3-4 nights a week and an occasional weekend.  Smaller hospitals should not allow themselves to become hide- outs for physicians who have no intent to meet the obligations that title implies.  How about larger facilities that &#039;have no call requirement&#039; in certain subspecialties?  The community hospital that makes a significant profit in their outpatient surgery center  as the only facility in town with affiliated oral surgeons.  Why do the oral surgeons practice only there?  Because the hospital&#039;s rules allow them to take every night and weekend off.  Why does the hospital allow that?  $$$$$  And that state operated trauma transfer center?  Someone is going to die.  Real life: the neurosurgeon is in the OR and has a second crani holding in the ER and a post op patient in the neuro ICU that needs emergent attention, the trauma surgeon and his backup are up to their elbows in the evening&#039;s carnage, the OR is running all 4 call teams, the ER is holding something-teen patients for monitor and ICU beds and is backed up several hours.  The trauma transfer center calls and, by state regulation, forces the acceptance of 2 more transferring trauma patients.  How, I ask, is the receiving facility going to be able to provide any conceivable level of care, much less avoid allowing someone to fall through the cracks.  By the way- the concept of referring minor or moderately injured patients to facilites, other than the trauma center, that have claimed to have the ability to care for them &quot;hasn&#039;t matured yet&quot;.  And before anyone becomes defensive about rural facilities with legitimately limited capabilities I understand where you are coming from.  I actually worked in a 28 bed hospital with 2 FPs and one general surgeon.  No one, especially at the facility to which patients were referred, expected more of that hospital than could reasonably be provided- limited medical and general surgical care.  The expectation of that hospital&#039;s administration and medical staff was that their capabilities and capacities would be employed first and then, if necessary, others would be called upon for assistance.  That is the way it should be, every where.  To expect anything else is to propagate dysfunction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having managed a hospital transfer center accepting nearly 3000 patients a year and working in a &#8220;model&#8221;, yet dysfunctional, trauma system I agree with the originating author.  Hospitals have a responsibility to determine the average needs of the community they serve and then to make a good faith effort to meet those needs.  Have 2 orthopedic surgeons on staff scoping knees and performing other profitable procedures Monday through Friday?  Then make a plan to provide coverage for the colles&#8217; fracture that walks into your ER at least 3-4 nights a week and an occasional weekend.  Smaller hospitals should not allow themselves to become hide- outs for physicians who have no intent to meet the obligations that title implies.  How about larger facilities that &#8216;have no call requirement&#8217; in certain subspecialties?  The community hospital that makes a significant profit in their outpatient surgery center  as the only facility in town with affiliated oral surgeons.  Why do the oral surgeons practice only there?  Because the hospital&#8217;s rules allow them to take every night and weekend off.  Why does the hospital allow that?  $$$$$  And that state operated trauma transfer center?  Someone is going to die.  Real life: the neurosurgeon is in the OR and has a second crani holding in the ER and a post op patient in the neuro ICU that needs emergent attention, the trauma surgeon and his backup are up to their elbows in the evening&#8217;s carnage, the OR is running all 4 call teams, the ER is holding something-teen patients for monitor and ICU beds and is backed up several hours.  The trauma transfer center calls and, by state regulation, forces the acceptance of 2 more transferring trauma patients.  How, I ask, is the receiving facility going to be able to provide any conceivable level of care, much less avoid allowing someone to fall through the cracks.  By the way- the concept of referring minor or moderately injured patients to facilites, other than the trauma center, that have claimed to have the ability to care for them &#8220;hasn&#8217;t matured yet&#8221;.  And before anyone becomes defensive about rural facilities with legitimately limited capabilities I understand where you are coming from.  I actually worked in a 28 bed hospital with 2 FPs and one general surgeon.  No one, especially at the facility to which patients were referred, expected more of that hospital than could reasonably be provided- limited medical and general surgical care.  The expectation of that hospital&#8217;s administration and medical staff was that their capabilities and capacities would be employed first and then, if necessary, others would be called upon for assistance.  That is the way it should be, every where.  To expect anything else is to propagate dysfunction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoorYorick</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>PoorYorick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>What I can&#039;t stand are the small hospitals that have 2 or 3 doctors in a specialty but never make them take call. They call and demand a transfer but we know who works there.
They bludgeon us with EMTALA but there is no mechanism to make these skimmers do their part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can&#8217;t stand are the small hospitals that have 2 or 3 doctors in a specialty but never make them take call. They call and demand a transfer but we know who works there.<br />
They bludgeon us with EMTALA but there is no mechanism to make these skimmers do their part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Rounds 5:1 - In Your Own Words // Emergiblog</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Rounds 5:1 - In Your Own Words // Emergiblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>[...] Roberts, Transfers: And, the hard and ugly truth: transfers have allowed a lot of very dysfunctional hospitals to stay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Roberts, Transfers: And, the hard and ugly truth: transfers have allowed a lot of very dysfunctional hospitals to stay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12418</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12418</guid>
		<description>NCT TRAC - North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council

Scribes are required to know all the abbreviations :)

I&#039;m still on board with your previous suggestion -- Stop the ER-ER transfers, take the ED doc out of it, go to a transfer center model, let the sending doc talk to the specialist, and if they won&#039;t accept then sic the EMTALA dogs on them.  I&#039;ve seen few transfers that really even needed to be seen in the ER for stabilization.  Direct admit them to the specialist.  The pt will just be more pissed after they&#039;ve sat in an ED hall bed anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCT TRAC &#8211; North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council</p>
<p>Scribes are required to know all the abbreviations :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still on board with your previous suggestion &#8212; Stop the ER-ER transfers, take the ED doc out of it, go to a transfer center model, let the sending doc talk to the specialist, and if they won&#8217;t accept then sic the EMTALA dogs on them.  I&#8217;ve seen few transfers that really even needed to be seen in the ER for stabilization.  Direct admit them to the specialist.  The pt will just be more pissed after they&#8217;ve sat in an ED hall bed anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GruntDoc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12407</link>
		<dc:creator>GruntDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12407</guid>
		<description>Gunner,
I have moonlit in small places, and transferred.  It&#039;s not easy but it can be done.  I have also been put in the bind of moving the dump, because the specialist we had on staff didn&#039;t want to do their job that day.  Unpleasant.

As for your state getting a trauma system and that spreading the load: maybe.  We have a regional trauma RAHC (not sure what the acronym stands for) but it&#039;s a safety valve for a hospital with a trauma problem they can&#039;t handle to call one place, the they put them in touch with the next trauma hospital on the list.  It works fairly well (it helps people make the right decisions when they know they&#039;re being recorded); I don&#039;t know that it would solve a &#039;send all trauma to the mecca&#039; problem, but it would help to spread those cases around the meccas.

The unintended consequence of having a &#039;trauma system&#039; is that it relieves a lot of docs who do trauma now, in smaller hospitals, from having to keep doing it.  &quot;It&#039;s a trauma, transfer them to the trauma center&quot; is then a perfectly viable option, and it gets exercised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunner,<br />
I have moonlit in small places, and transferred.  It&#8217;s not easy but it can be done.  I have also been put in the bind of moving the dump, because the specialist we had on staff didn&#8217;t want to do their job that day.  Unpleasant.</p>
<p>As for your state getting a trauma system and that spreading the load: maybe.  We have a regional trauma RAHC (not sure what the acronym stands for) but it&#8217;s a safety valve for a hospital with a trauma problem they can&#8217;t handle to call one place, the they put them in touch with the next trauma hospital on the list.  It works fairly well (it helps people make the right decisions when they know they&#8217;re being recorded); I don&#8217;t know that it would solve a &#8216;send all trauma to the mecca&#8217; problem, but it would help to spread those cases around the meccas.</p>
<p>The unintended consequence of having a &#8216;trauma system&#8217; is that it relieves a lot of docs who do trauma now, in smaller hospitals, from having to keep doing it.  &#8220;It&#8217;s a trauma, transfer them to the trauma center&#8221; is then a perfectly viable option, and it gets exercised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunner</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12404</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12404</guid>
		<description>Gruntdoc,  

You really stirred up the pot on this one.
 I have worked at the smaller hospitals and had to transfer lots of patients that could have been taken care of at any hospital.  Sometimes it was that there was no specialist available or they just didn&#039;t want to get involved.  I have a problem with someone trying to transfer a pt that hasn&#039;t been assessed by their specialist when they have one.  However, most of time there is no specialist and the ED doc has no choice.  I suggest you go work a weekend in some small town TX ED and see how difficult it is to get a pt to a specialist in the middle of the night.

I now work at a hospital that accepts pts for the entire state.  It is painful to deal with all the dumps when your ED is already at capacity. One thing we did was to take the ED docs out of the loop and have the transferrring MD talk directly to the accepting specialist. If a specialist is not readily available then it goes to IM, Surgery or Trauma, accordingly.  
One question. Since we are the only state in the country without a state wide trauma system, and we are assuming a trauma system will allow us to send pts to other level II or III centers and help ease the burden on the two hospitals in the state that take most of the transfers. Do you think having a trauma system will help to sread out the transfers to level II or III centers or do they all still come to you?

Good topic, good comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gruntdoc,  </p>
<p>You really stirred up the pot on this one.<br />
 I have worked at the smaller hospitals and had to transfer lots of patients that could have been taken care of at any hospital.  Sometimes it was that there was no specialist available or they just didn&#8217;t want to get involved.  I have a problem with someone trying to transfer a pt that hasn&#8217;t been assessed by their specialist when they have one.  However, most of time there is no specialist and the ED doc has no choice.  I suggest you go work a weekend in some small town TX ED and see how difficult it is to get a pt to a specialist in the middle of the night.</p>
<p>I now work at a hospital that accepts pts for the entire state.  It is painful to deal with all the dumps when your ED is already at capacity. One thing we did was to take the ED docs out of the loop and have the transferrring MD talk directly to the accepting specialist. If a specialist is not readily available then it goes to IM, Surgery or Trauma, accordingly.<br />
One question. Since we are the only state in the country without a state wide trauma system, and we are assuming a trauma system will allow us to send pts to other level II or III centers and help ease the burden on the two hospitals in the state that take most of the transfers. Do you think having a trauma system will help to sread out the transfers to level II or III centers or do they all still come to you?</p>
<p>Good topic, good comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suburban ER Doc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12403</link>
		<dc:creator>Suburban ER Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12403</guid>
		<description>You may never say a word but some of your colleagues and the specialists give us the third degree.  I&#039;ve been told by people at your hospital that they know better than I what my hospital can do!

It&#039;s nice to hear that you are trying to fill out your medical staff.  What makes you think that others aren&#039;t?  

I&#039;m just suggesting that you should be careful with that broad brush of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may never say a word but some of your colleagues and the specialists give us the third degree.  I&#8217;ve been told by people at your hospital that they know better than I what my hospital can do!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to hear that you are trying to fill out your medical staff.  What makes you think that others aren&#8217;t?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just suggesting that you should be careful with that broad brush of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFW ER doc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12402</link>
		<dc:creator>DFW ER doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12402</guid>
		<description>Having been on both ends of the transfer many times, I have noticed that sometimes when I try to transfer a patient, I get a difficult ED physician who is not happy to hear about a transfer, and sometimes they will grill me or press me for minutiae about the patient and their presentation.  Doesn&#039;t happen often, but this is one reason you may get such a detailed history. 
But I can&#039;t say I blame them too much because when I accept transfers, I like to have a good knowledge of why the patient is being sent and what to expect when they hit the door.  

If they say a patient has a peritonsillar abscess and they don&#039;t have ENT coverage, how do they know it&#039;s an abscess?  Have they done a CT?  Attempted needle aspiration?  Is the patient having any breathing difficulties?  What meds have been given?  Just one example but it&#039;s nice to know some details as far as I&#039;m concerned.  Other reason I bring this up is that not all ED physicians are created equal.  Not to offend people who work in smaller places; often times they do a great job.  But the more I hear about the management the more I know about their skill level and why they are sending them.  If they have a head bleed, did they get cerebryx?  Is the head of the bed elevated?  I like to know these kinds of things, and if you don&#039;t ask you may have your head bleed show up seizing because someone didn&#039;t think of something before sending them, or wind up having to do more work on your end than you should have....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been on both ends of the transfer many times, I have noticed that sometimes when I try to transfer a patient, I get a difficult ED physician who is not happy to hear about a transfer, and sometimes they will grill me or press me for minutiae about the patient and their presentation.  Doesn&#8217;t happen often, but this is one reason you may get such a detailed history.<br />
But I can&#8217;t say I blame them too much because when I accept transfers, I like to have a good knowledge of why the patient is being sent and what to expect when they hit the door.  </p>
<p>If they say a patient has a peritonsillar abscess and they don&#8217;t have ENT coverage, how do they know it&#8217;s an abscess?  Have they done a CT?  Attempted needle aspiration?  Is the patient having any breathing difficulties?  What meds have been given?  Just one example but it&#8217;s nice to know some details as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  Other reason I bring this up is that not all ED physicians are created equal.  Not to offend people who work in smaller places; often times they do a great job.  But the more I hear about the management the more I know about their skill level and why they are sending them.  If they have a head bleed, did they get cerebryx?  Is the head of the bed elevated?  I like to know these kinds of things, and if you don&#8217;t ask you may have your head bleed show up seizing because someone didn&#8217;t think of something before sending them, or wind up having to do more work on your end than you should have&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GruntDoc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12400</link>
		<dc:creator>GruntDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12400</guid>
		<description>I wondered if anyone still read this blog.  Now I know how to rouse people to comment.

First, let&#039;s separate out the difference between the EM doc I&#039;m talking to and the hospital they work at.  I know the EM doc (usually) is just the middleman.  (Usually).  I have worked away from meccas, realize there are true limits to capabilities, and never say a word to those docs at those hospitals.

Second, my hospital isn&#039;t perfect, and we still have coverage gaps, requiring occasional transfers out.  Our hospital admin is actively, aggressively recruiting to fill the gaps, and we still take a lot more than we send away.  The difference is we&#039;re trying, and we take a ton of transfers.

Talk to any docs who take a lot of transfer calls from a lot of places, and you can smell the dumps.  They do happen, and they seem to come from the Usual Suspects of sending joints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if anyone still read this blog.  Now I know how to rouse people to comment.</p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s separate out the difference between the EM doc I&#8217;m talking to and the hospital they work at.  I know the EM doc (usually) is just the middleman.  (Usually).  I have worked away from meccas, realize there are true limits to capabilities, and never say a word to those docs at those hospitals.</p>
<p>Second, my hospital isn&#8217;t perfect, and we still have coverage gaps, requiring occasional transfers out.  Our hospital admin is actively, aggressively recruiting to fill the gaps, and we still take a lot more than we send away.  The difference is we&#8217;re trying, and we take a ton of transfers.</p>
<p>Talk to any docs who take a lot of transfer calls from a lot of places, and you can smell the dumps.  They do happen, and they seem to come from the Usual Suspects of sending joints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suburban ER Doc</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2008/09/transfers.html/comment-page-1#comment-12398</link>
		<dc:creator>Suburban ER Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 03:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=2490#comment-12398</guid>
		<description>Grunt doc,

I also agree with Whitecoat.  Do you think the ER doc across town is personally responsible for recruiting a full medical staff?  Besides, I know for a fact that your hospital can&#039;t always handle every everything either.  Should you take the &quot;Hospital&quot; sign down if you don&#039;t have a hand surgeon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grunt doc,</p>
<p>I also agree with Whitecoat.  Do you think the ER doc across town is personally responsible for recruiting a full medical staff?  Besides, I know for a fact that your hospital can&#8217;t always handle every everything either.  Should you take the &#8220;Hospital&#8221; sign down if you don&#8217;t have a hand surgeon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

