<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running a hospital: What a public plan is really for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gruntdoc.com/2009/06/running-a-hospital-what-a-public-plan-is-really-for.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2009/06/running-a-hospital-what-a-public-plan-is-really-for.html</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Emergency Physician in Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg P</title>
		<link>http://gruntdoc.com/2009/06/running-a-hospital-what-a-public-plan-is-really-for.html/comment-page-1#comment-18390</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gruntdoc.com/?p=3702#comment-18390</guid>
		<description>What I would like to see is someone begin to talk about the principles under which some health care proposal would operate rather than some vague public vs private concept. We&#039;ve seen the bad with both public and private health insurance, so it isn&#039;t like one can make any sensible argument about one label or the other. Public healthcare (eg, Medicare) has a history of overpromising then underfunding. Private health insurance would like to insure only those who don&#039;t need healthcare, and secondarily fight tooth and nail to deny payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I would like to see is someone begin to talk about the principles under which some health care proposal would operate rather than some vague public vs private concept. We&#8217;ve seen the bad with both public and private health insurance, so it isn&#8217;t like one can make any sensible argument about one label or the other. Public healthcare (eg, Medicare) has a history of overpromising then underfunding. Private health insurance would like to insure only those who don&#8217;t need healthcare, and secondarily fight tooth and nail to deny payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

